신사고운동을 실증하는 실험? In 1988 Rene Peoc’h's experiment in which day-old imprinted chicks influenced a robot to come to their cage.

 https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/110mo9r/in_1988_rene_peochs_experiment_in_which_dayold/

 

 

r/Damnthatsinteresting - A cage B cage Figure 3.12. Psychokinesis experiments conducted by Rene Peoc'h on young chicks interacting with a robot controlled by random number generator. (Peoc'h, 1988)

Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

 

 

 

A) The control experiment when the cage was empty. B) Experiment in which day-old chicks imprinted with the robot were kept in the cage.  


https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/9/jse_09_2_peoch.pdf

seems there are a lot of open questions.. The robot has a candle and it only worked if that was on .. also only if done in the morning. And these "random number" generator are not always true random. 

Well who knows if you don't use scientific methods to find out .. russia did some experiments with kitten to test the connection from the mother over distance. And there is at least the possibility of quantum effects within the endoplasmic reticulum of cells.

There is the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Consciousness_Project quite interesting. 

 

 

So, we have a robot that moves randomly and its movement is controlled by a random numbers generator (RNG) that is installed in another room (not on the robot itself) and can be placed “inside a lead box, a Faraday box, a container full of water, etc., which can shield it against various types of electromagnetic interference” (which shielding was actually applied in this experiment is not specified by the way). So, if the chicks change the movement of the robot which movement is controlled by the RNG do they actually affect the shielded(presumably) RNG in another room they don’t know of? Why the chicks’ will does not work during the day? Why it works only when the candle is of certain length? A really impressive result would be to observe that the robot to move against the RNG generated numbers i. e the RNG “tells” the robot to go forward but it goes backwards (or any other direction) due to the will of the chicks. That would be very interesting.

 
 
 
Discussed in Wired magazine in 1995 https://www.wired.com/1995/04/pear/ 
 
 
 
 

ok so we have a robot that clearly is designed to turn when it meets an obstacle. In the first image the obstacles are the walls. Then you add chickens that presumably take over the left half of the enclosure. If they are not themselves enclosed in the enclosure they will wander but be afraid of the robot. The pattern in B is totally consistent with a robot avoiding chicks and the chicks avoiding the robot. And you idiots want to claim that it is Psychokinesis?!!! You can't even do pseudo science well!!!

 

My first thought was the same. But in the experiment the chicks were not in the enclosure, they were in a cage on the side of the table so they couldn't affect the robot's movements

 

they couldn't affect the robot's movements

So why hasn't this experiment been replicated? Have you tried it? It's fake. The department in which the experiment was allegedly conducted was closed down.

 
 

It is funny. First you tried to point out a flaw in the experiment (assuming wrongly that the chicks were inside the enclosure, although you swear to have read the experiment...). Then, as soon as you realized your point was wrong, you jumped immediately to "the experiment was never replicated", abandoning your first line of thought in no time.... I'm not saying the experiment is 100% right, I'm just saying your attitude suggest a personal bias, that isn't also very scientific...I would love to see the experiment being replicated as well.

 

 


Comments

Popular Posts

제임스 코벳: 지역 정부가 곧 세계정부이다 1 / 프랑스, 캐나다도 EU 가입할 수 있어 / 다극화된 세계질서는 신세계질서의 연막술 / 골드만삭스 출신 짐 오닐이 만든 용어 BRICS / 브릭스 국가들이 기술 관료주의, 과두제, 온라인 검열, 사회 신용 시스템, 코로나19 팬데믹, 생물 안보, 지속 가능한 개발 목표 등 모든 것에 동의하는 이유는 '거대한 클럽'에 속해 있기 때문 / 중국이 주도하는 국제은행간통신협회(SWIFT) 대안인 중국은행간결제시스템(CIPS)은 거래의 80%를 SWIFT 네트워크에 의존 / 존 메이너드 케인스의 '뱅코어(Bankor)' 개념은 생산적인 대출을 통해 인프라 투자를 장려하는 것이었으며, 이는 BRICS 국가들의 대출 철학과 유사 / BRICS 국가들이 국제통화기금(IMF)과 같은 '약탈적인 괴물'로부터 세계를 구원할 것이라는 주장과 달리, 아시아인프라투자은행(AIIB)과 신개발은행(NDB) 설립 직후 이들과 세계은행, IMF 간의 제도적 연결고리가 드러났다. IMF 총재 크리스틴 라가르드는 AIIB와의 협력을 약속했다. 세계은행 총재 김용은 AIIB 출범을 축하하며 협력을 약속했다. 신개발은행 총재는 경쟁 관계가 아닌 상호 보완적인 관계임을 밝히며 협력 협정을 체결했다. BRICS 신개발은행 부총재는 IMF 집행 이사로 활동하며 협력과 공동 행동을 약속했다. AIIB와 NDB 설립을 앞두고 '게임의 판도를 완전히 바꿀 것'이라는 기대가 있었지만, 실제로는 기존 시스템과의 협력을 통해 '시스템의 일부'가 되는 것을 목표로 했다. / 유엔은 러시아와 중국이 시행한 격리 및 전염병 통제 조치를 칭찬하며, 유엔이 테러 및 평화 유지에 중심적인 역할을 해야 한다고 주장한다. / 세계 정부 1.0은 국제 연맹, 2.0은 유엔으로 볼 수 있으며, 3.0은 다극화된 세계 질서이다. / 러시아와 중국은 세계주의자들에 맞서 싸우는 것이 아니라, 단지 세계 정부 테이블에 앉을 자리를 놓고 경쟁하는 것이다.