Universities divided over tuition hikes for foreign students

 https://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/16220515

 

 

Photo/Illutration Waseda University in Tokyo’s Shinjuku Ward (Asahi Shimbun file photo)

With caps on tuition for international students lifted, some leading universities in Japan are  hiking the fees to boost revenue while others are worried about fairness and hurting campus diversity. 

While raising international student tuition aligns Japan with many universities in Western nations, the issue has divided the academic community.

The division in the debate is clear.

Tohoku University in Sendai and Hiroshima University have committed to raising international student tuition, while Waseda University in Tokyo has announced it is exploring the possibility.

Yet, many of their peers remain cautious or opposed to such a hike. 

When contacted by The Asahi Shimbun recently, a significant number of institutions—including top-ranked universities in Tokyo and Kyoto—described the matter as “undecided,” signaling widespread deliberation across the sector.

DEREGULATION OPENS THE DOOR

Tuition fees for national universities are set by an education ministry ordinance at a standard 535,800 yen ($3,500) per year. Universities are free to set their own fees up to a ceiling of 1.2 times that amount, or 642,960 yen.

However, the ministry removed this cap for international students only in March 2024.

In response, Tohoku University announced on Dec. 1 that from the 2027 academic year, it will raise tuition to 900,000 yen—1.7 times the current rate—for incoming undergraduate and master's program students.

Hiroshima University has also decided on a policy to raise fees for undergraduate students and is currently considering the amount and timing of the increase.

Waseda University also announced this month that it is considering a hike for students who have not yet mastered the Japanese language.

When The Asahi Shimbun surveyed universities that accept a large number of international students, Osaka University, Hokkaido University and Keio University in Tokyo responded that they are "not considering it."

On the other hand, the University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Nagoya University, Kyushu University in Fukuoka, the University of Tsukuba in Ibaraki Prefecture, and the Institute of Science Tokyo stated that the matter is "undecided."

CONTENTIOUS DEBATE

The president of a national university that is "not considering" hiking tuition for international students said, "A tuition increase would have a significant impact on applicants from developing countries. It could narrow the diversity of our students' home regions."

The president of a private university that is "currently considering what to do" said, "We need to carefully examine and consider the difference in the cost required for Japanese students versus international students. We shouldn't make a simplistic decision just because universities in the United States and Britain charge international students two or three times more."

International students often require special attention from universities due to differences in language and lifestyle, which tends to increase personnel and other university costs.

For this reason, prominent national universities hoping to increase their enrollment of international students had requested deregulation, leading to the ministry to revise its ordinance on student tuition in 2024.

INCENTIVES AND CONDITIONS

However, national universities willing to raise their tuition were slow to take action.

An education ministry official said, "I suspect that while multiple universities were considering it, none wanted to be the 'first penguin.'"

A penalty related to student enrollment caps also posed an obstacle for universities wanting to accept more international students.

For large faculties, if the number of students reaches 105 percent of the enrollment capacity, the university is barred from establishing new faculties.

Since it is difficult to predict the number of international students, universities wanting to avoid the penalty were reluctant to increase their intake.

In response, the ministry introduced a special exemption in July to ease this regulation.

If universities meet certain conditions, such as creating a plan to increase their international student ratio by 10 percent or more over 15 years, the penalty threshold is raised to "110 percent of the enrollment capacity."

At that time, the ministry requested that universities implement financial measures such as raising tuition for international students.

A senior ministry official said, "Without covering the costs, you cannot guarantee an improved quality of education."

While not mandatory, the universities are strongly urged to take such measures.

A national university president criticized this requirement, saying, "To achieve a multicultural society, it is necessary to treat everyone equally, regardless of their origin or cultural background. Tuition should not differ based on one's place of origin or nationality."

Conversely, another national university president, mindful of political opposition to increasing international student numbers, said, "When you consider the balance, it can't be helped."

GLOBAL CONTEXT

At prominent universities in the United States and Britain, international students often pay much higher tuition than domestic students.

For example, at the University of Cambridge in Britain, tuition from 2025 to 2026 is 9,535 pounds (1.9 million yen) per year for domestic students. For international students, it ranges from 27,024 to 70,554 pounds, depending on the faculty.

In the United States, private universities such as Harvard University charge the same tuition for both international and domestic students.

On the other hand, at state universities, it is common for out-of-state students, including international ones, to pay higher tuition than in-state students.

For example, the University of Maryland charges in-state students more than $10,000 (1.5 million yen) and out-of-state students more than $40,000.

However, the United States offers a robust system of various scholarships and financial aid, allowing many international students to attend universities with a smaller financial burden.

According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), looking at tuition fees at national and public universities in 18 comparable countries from 2022 to 2023, only five countries had no difference between the two groups: Japan, Italy, Germany, Norway and Spain.

In Norway, tuition was free for both international and domestic students.

In other countries, tuition for international students was 2 to 16 times higher.

When looking at the amount converted to U.S. dollars to account for price levels, France had the largest ratio at 16 times.

The price difference in Canada was as high as 5.5 times.

Some countries also had different tuition fees depending on whether a student was from within or outside the EU.

Among these, Finland's tuition was free for students from within the EU, while international students were charged $12,084.

(This article was written by Fumio Masutani, Amane Shimazaki and Kayoko Sekiguchi.)

 

Comments

Popular Posts

제임스 코벳: 지역 정부가 곧 세계정부이다 1 / 프랑스, 캐나다도 EU 가입할 수 있어 / 다극화된 세계질서는 신세계질서의 연막술 / 골드만삭스 출신 짐 오닐이 만든 용어 BRICS / 브릭스 국가들이 기술 관료주의, 과두제, 온라인 검열, 사회 신용 시스템, 코로나19 팬데믹, 생물 안보, 지속 가능한 개발 목표 등 모든 것에 동의하는 이유는 '거대한 클럽'에 속해 있기 때문 / 중국이 주도하는 국제은행간통신협회(SWIFT) 대안인 중국은행간결제시스템(CIPS)은 거래의 80%를 SWIFT 네트워크에 의존 / 존 메이너드 케인스의 '뱅코어(Bankor)' 개념은 생산적인 대출을 통해 인프라 투자를 장려하는 것이었으며, 이는 BRICS 국가들의 대출 철학과 유사 / BRICS 국가들이 국제통화기금(IMF)과 같은 '약탈적인 괴물'로부터 세계를 구원할 것이라는 주장과 달리, 아시아인프라투자은행(AIIB)과 신개발은행(NDB) 설립 직후 이들과 세계은행, IMF 간의 제도적 연결고리가 드러났다. IMF 총재 크리스틴 라가르드는 AIIB와의 협력을 약속했다. 세계은행 총재 김용은 AIIB 출범을 축하하며 협력을 약속했다. 신개발은행 총재는 경쟁 관계가 아닌 상호 보완적인 관계임을 밝히며 협력 협정을 체결했다. BRICS 신개발은행 부총재는 IMF 집행 이사로 활동하며 협력과 공동 행동을 약속했다. AIIB와 NDB 설립을 앞두고 '게임의 판도를 완전히 바꿀 것'이라는 기대가 있었지만, 실제로는 기존 시스템과의 협력을 통해 '시스템의 일부'가 되는 것을 목표로 했다. / 유엔은 러시아와 중국이 시행한 격리 및 전염병 통제 조치를 칭찬하며, 유엔이 테러 및 평화 유지에 중심적인 역할을 해야 한다고 주장한다. / 세계 정부 1.0은 국제 연맹, 2.0은 유엔으로 볼 수 있으며, 3.0은 다극화된 세계 질서이다. / 러시아와 중국은 세계주의자들에 맞서 싸우는 것이 아니라, 단지 세계 정부 테이블에 앉을 자리를 놓고 경쟁하는 것이다.