1982년 버킹엄 궁을 두번이나 칩입하고 엘리자베스 여왕 침실에 난입한 Michael Fagan

 https://blog.naver.com/PostView.naver?blogId=medeiason&logNo=223659231770&categoryNo=0&parentCategoryNo=0&viewDate=&currentPage=1&postListTopCurrentPage=&from=postList

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fagan

 

Break-ins

[edit]

First entry

[edit]
Buckingham Palace, pictured in 1980

In early July 1982, Fagan intruded into Buckingham Palace. He stated that he shimmied up a drainpipe and startled a housemaid, who called security. He disappeared before guards arrived, who then disbelieved the housemaid's report. Fagan said he then entered the palace through an unlocked window on the roof and wandered around for the next half-hour while eating cheese and crackers. Three alarms in total were tripped, but the police turned them off, believing they were faulty. He viewed royal portraits and sat for some time on a throne. He also spoke of entering the post room. He drank a half bottle of white wine, became tired and left.[1]

Second entry

[edit]

At around 7:00 a.m. on 9 July 1982, Fagan scaled Buckingham Palace's 14-foot-high (4.3 m) perimeter wall, which was topped with revolving spikes and barbed wire,[4] and climbed up a drainpipe.[2] An alarm sensor detected his movements, but police thought the alarm was faulty and silenced it.[1] Fagan wandered the corridors for several minutes before reaching the royal apartments. In an anteroom, Fagan broke a glass ashtray, cutting his hand. He entered the bedroom of Queen Elizabeth II at about 7:15 am carrying a fragment of glass.[2]

The Queen woke when Fagan disturbed a curtain. Initial reports said he had sat on the edge of her bed and that they had a long conversation; however, Fagan said in a 2012 interview to The Independent that the Queen left the room immediately to seek security.[5] The Queen phoned the palace switchboard twice for police, but none arrived, so she used her bedside alarm bell. She also beckoned a housemaid in the corridor, who was quickly dispatched to seek urgent help.[6] The duty footman, Paul Whybrew, who had been walking the Queen's dogs, arrived, followed by two policemen on palace duty, who removed Fagan. The incident had happened as the armed police officer outside the royal bedroom came off duty before his replacement arrived.[4]

A subsequent police report was critical of the competence of officers on duty, as well as a system of confused and divided command.[2] The Home Secretary, who held sole responsibility for the police, William Whitelaw, offered his resignation but it was refused by the prime minister, Margaret Thatcher.[6][1]

Arrest

[edit]

Since Fagan's actions were, at the time, a civil wrong rather than a criminal offence, he was not charged with trespassing in the Queen's bedroom.[7] He was charged with theft of the wine, but the charges were dropped when he was committed for psychiatric evaluation. In late July, Fagan's mother said, "He thinks so much of the Queen. I can imagine him just wanting to simply talk and say hello and discuss his problems."[8] He spent the next three months in a psychiatric hospital[9] before being released on 21 January 1983.[10]

It was not until 2007, when Buckingham Palace became a "designated site" for the purposes of section 128 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, that trespass at the palace became a criminal offence.[11]

 

Comments

Popular Posts

제임스 코벳: 지역 정부가 곧 세계정부이다 1 / 프랑스, 캐나다도 EU 가입할 수 있어 / 다극화된 세계질서는 신세계질서의 연막술 / 골드만삭스 출신 짐 오닐이 만든 용어 BRICS / 브릭스 국가들이 기술 관료주의, 과두제, 온라인 검열, 사회 신용 시스템, 코로나19 팬데믹, 생물 안보, 지속 가능한 개발 목표 등 모든 것에 동의하는 이유는 '거대한 클럽'에 속해 있기 때문 / 중국이 주도하는 국제은행간통신협회(SWIFT) 대안인 중국은행간결제시스템(CIPS)은 거래의 80%를 SWIFT 네트워크에 의존 / 존 메이너드 케인스의 '뱅코어(Bankor)' 개념은 생산적인 대출을 통해 인프라 투자를 장려하는 것이었으며, 이는 BRICS 국가들의 대출 철학과 유사 / BRICS 국가들이 국제통화기금(IMF)과 같은 '약탈적인 괴물'로부터 세계를 구원할 것이라는 주장과 달리, 아시아인프라투자은행(AIIB)과 신개발은행(NDB) 설립 직후 이들과 세계은행, IMF 간의 제도적 연결고리가 드러났다. IMF 총재 크리스틴 라가르드는 AIIB와의 협력을 약속했다. 세계은행 총재 김용은 AIIB 출범을 축하하며 협력을 약속했다. 신개발은행 총재는 경쟁 관계가 아닌 상호 보완적인 관계임을 밝히며 협력 협정을 체결했다. BRICS 신개발은행 부총재는 IMF 집행 이사로 활동하며 협력과 공동 행동을 약속했다. AIIB와 NDB 설립을 앞두고 '게임의 판도를 완전히 바꿀 것'이라는 기대가 있었지만, 실제로는 기존 시스템과의 협력을 통해 '시스템의 일부'가 되는 것을 목표로 했다. / 유엔은 러시아와 중국이 시행한 격리 및 전염병 통제 조치를 칭찬하며, 유엔이 테러 및 평화 유지에 중심적인 역할을 해야 한다고 주장한다. / 세계 정부 1.0은 국제 연맹, 2.0은 유엔으로 볼 수 있으며, 3.0은 다극화된 세계 질서이다. / 러시아와 중국은 세계주의자들에 맞서 싸우는 것이 아니라, 단지 세계 정부 테이블에 앉을 자리를 놓고 경쟁하는 것이다.