Parag Khanna - The Future is Asian: Commerce, Conflict and Culture

 

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parag_Khanna

 

Parag Khanna (born 27 July 1977 in Kanpur) is an Indian American specialist in geopolitics and globalization.[1] He is the managing partner of FutureMap, and former managing partner of Hybrid Reality as well as Co-Founder & CEO of Factotum.[2][better source needed]

Early life and education

Khanna was born in Kanpur, India.[3] His childhood was spent between India and the United Arab Emirates before his family moved to New York City.[4] He obtained the degree of Bachelor of Science in International Affairs from the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University,[5] and also a Master of Arts in Security Studies from Georgetown in 2005.[6] In 2010, he received his PhD in international relations from the London School of Economics, completing a thesis entitled The World Economic Forum: An anatomy of multi-stakeholder global policy-making.[7][8]

Career

From 1999 to 2000, Khanna was a research associate at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.[9] From 2000 to 2002, he worked at the World Economic Forum.[3] From 2002 to 2005, he was a Global Governance Fellow at the Brookings Institution. From 2006 to 2012, he was a senior research fellow at the New America Foundation[6][failed verification] in Washington, D.C.. From 2012 to 2018, he was a senior research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

His other affiliations include Richard von Weizsaecker Fellow of the Robert Bosch Academy in 2017, senior fellow of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs (2012–2014), visiting fellow at LSE IDEAS (2011–2013),[10][failed verification] and senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (2011–2013) and distinguished visitor at the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto.[citation needed] In 2010, he became the first video-blogger for ForeignPolicy.com.[11][better source needed] From 2008 to 2009, Parag was the host of "InnerView" on MTV.[citation needed]

Government service

In 2007, Khanna served as a Senior Geopolitical Advisor to US Special Operations Forces deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.[12][better source needed][13][better source needed]

Books

Khanna's first book was The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. In 2008, Khanna authored an essay adapted from this book in the New York Times Magazine titled "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony".[14]

In 2011, How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance, Khanna's sequel to The Second World.[15] In the book, he argues that the world is entering a “postmodern Middle Ages” in which global governance takes the form of “mega-diplomacy” among coalitions of public and private actors.[16]

In 2012, Khanna co-authored a book with Ayesha Khanna, called Hybrid Reality: Thriving in the Emerging Human-Technology Civilization.[17] The book presents how humanity is moving beyond the information revolution into a "Hybrid Age" in which technology is incorporated into all aspects of human life. It developed concepts such as "geotechnology" and "Technology Quotient (TQ)".[18]

In 2016, his book Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization, was the completion of Khanna's trilogy on world order.[19] The book argues that connectivity in the form of transportation, energy and communications infrastructure has brought about a "global network revolution" in which human civilization becomes reorganized according to cities and supply chains more than nations and borders.[20]

In 2017, Amazon CreateSpace published his book Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State. It argued that the US government requires a better balance between representation and administration, explored diverse governance systems and proposed an organizational redesign for the US federal government.[21]

In 2019, Khanna published the book The Future is Asian: Commerce, Conflict and Culture in the 21st Century, which analyses the shift in global power location from the West to the continent Asia, and comments on the growing common identity among its collective nations.[22] He examines the reemergence of an "Asian system" after the end of colonialism and Cold War, and how Asia's collective rise impacts geopolitics, economics, and culture has shifted away from US hegemony.[23]

In 2021, Simon & Schuster published MOVE: The Forces Uprooting Us, in which Khanna forecasts the future of human geography in light of colliding megatrends such as demographics, geopolitics, technological automation and climate change.[24]

Criticism

In 2011, editors at The New Republic named him one of the "Most Over-Rated Thinkers" of the year, calling Khanna's book How to Run The World a "self-congratulatory anthology of clichés and platitudes".[11] In the same magazine a year later, Evgeny Morozov was strongly critical of Khanna when he reviewed Hybrid Reality by describing Khanna as an "intellectual impostor" possessed of "contempt for democracy and human rights" and criticising his admiration of authoritarian governments in China and Singapore.[25]

 

Comments

Popular Posts

제임스 코벳: 지역 정부가 곧 세계정부이다 1 / 프랑스, 캐나다도 EU 가입할 수 있어 / 다극화된 세계질서는 신세계질서의 연막술 / 골드만삭스 출신 짐 오닐이 만든 용어 BRICS / 브릭스 국가들이 기술 관료주의, 과두제, 온라인 검열, 사회 신용 시스템, 코로나19 팬데믹, 생물 안보, 지속 가능한 개발 목표 등 모든 것에 동의하는 이유는 '거대한 클럽'에 속해 있기 때문 / 중국이 주도하는 국제은행간통신협회(SWIFT) 대안인 중국은행간결제시스템(CIPS)은 거래의 80%를 SWIFT 네트워크에 의존 / 존 메이너드 케인스의 '뱅코어(Bankor)' 개념은 생산적인 대출을 통해 인프라 투자를 장려하는 것이었으며, 이는 BRICS 국가들의 대출 철학과 유사 / BRICS 국가들이 국제통화기금(IMF)과 같은 '약탈적인 괴물'로부터 세계를 구원할 것이라는 주장과 달리, 아시아인프라투자은행(AIIB)과 신개발은행(NDB) 설립 직후 이들과 세계은행, IMF 간의 제도적 연결고리가 드러났다. IMF 총재 크리스틴 라가르드는 AIIB와의 협력을 약속했다. 세계은행 총재 김용은 AIIB 출범을 축하하며 협력을 약속했다. 신개발은행 총재는 경쟁 관계가 아닌 상호 보완적인 관계임을 밝히며 협력 협정을 체결했다. BRICS 신개발은행 부총재는 IMF 집행 이사로 활동하며 협력과 공동 행동을 약속했다. AIIB와 NDB 설립을 앞두고 '게임의 판도를 완전히 바꿀 것'이라는 기대가 있었지만, 실제로는 기존 시스템과의 협력을 통해 '시스템의 일부'가 되는 것을 목표로 했다. / 유엔은 러시아와 중국이 시행한 격리 및 전염병 통제 조치를 칭찬하며, 유엔이 테러 및 평화 유지에 중심적인 역할을 해야 한다고 주장한다. / 세계 정부 1.0은 국제 연맹, 2.0은 유엔으로 볼 수 있으며, 3.0은 다극화된 세계 질서이다. / 러시아와 중국은 세계주의자들에 맞서 싸우는 것이 아니라, 단지 세계 정부 테이블에 앉을 자리를 놓고 경쟁하는 것이다.