Super Size Me의 진실: Morgan Spurlock이 2004년 한달동안 맥도날드 패스트푸드를 먹고 병에 걸린 것은 맥도날드의 탓인가, 아니면 그가 일부러 일일 권장 칼로리 이상을 먹으며 과식하고, 채식 대신 육식만 하고, 운동도 안했기 때문인가?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Size_Me#Reception


Reception

Super Size Me premiered at the 2004 Sundance Film Festival, where Morgan Spurlock won the Grand Jury Prize for directing the film.[17] The film opened in the U.S. on May 7, 2004, and grossed a total of $11,536,423 worldwide, making it the 22nd highest-grossing documentary film of all time.[18] It was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature, but lost to the film Born into Brothels. It did, however, win the award for Best Documentary Screenplay from the Writers Guild of America.[10]

The film received overall positive reviews from critics and audiences. It holds a 92% "Certified Fresh" rating on the film review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes based on 171 reviews, with an average rating of 7.73/10. The consensus calls the film an "entertaining doc about the adverse effects of eating fast food."[19] Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 73 out of 100, based on 37 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[20]

Super Size Me received two thumbs up on At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper. Caroline Westbrook for BBC News stated that the hype for the documentary was proper "to a certain extent", because of its serious message, and that, overall, the film's "high comedy factor and over-familiarity of the subject matter render it less powerful than other recent documentaries – but it still makes for enjoyable, thought-provoking viewing."[21] One reviewer said "he's telling us something everyone already knows: Fast food is bad for you."[22]

Robert Davis of Paste said the movie accomplished some of its goals and addressed an important topic, but, at the same time, sometimes looked more like a publicity stunt than a documentary. He primarily criticized the dramatic and unscientific approach of Super Size Me, saying Spurlock unnecessarily ate more than he had to and ignored his nutritionist's advice. Davis explained he would have been more interested had the documentary been about trying to eat as healthy as possible at McDonald's: "You could choose low-fat options, but it would be impossible to get enough vegetables and fiber, and the low-fat meal would be incredibly bland, the product of a system that has worked to optimize food delivery and consistency and, in doing so, has invented foods so devoid of flavor that they require dressings, oils, beef tallow and goopy coatings to make them more than just textured blobs. The industry has worked hard to convince consumers that these odd, sweet flavors are not only good but also unique, recognizable parts of a brand. Spurlock doesn't attempt to convey this message, presumably because the affects [sic] of too few vegetables and too little fiber aren't as dramatic as speedy weight-and-cholesterol gains."[23]

McDonald's UK responded that the author intentionally consumed an average of 5,000 calories per day and did not exercise, and that the results would have been the same regardless of the source of overeating.[24]

Counter-claims

In his reply documentary Fat Head, Tom Naughton "suggests that Spurlock's calorie and fat counts don't add up" and noted Spurlock's refusal to publish the Super Size Me food log. The Houston Chronicle reports: "Unlike Spurlock, Naughton has a page on his Web site that lists every item (including nutritional information) he ate during his fast-food month."[25]

After eating exclusively at McDonald's for one month, Soso Whaley said, "The first time I did the diet in April 2004, I lost 10 pounds (going from 175 to 165) and lowered my cholesterol from 237 to 197, a drop of 40 points." Of particular note was that she exercised regularly and did not insist on consuming more food than she otherwise would. Despite eating at only McDonald's every day, she maintained her caloric intake at around 2,000 per day.[26]

After John Cisna, a high school science teacher, lost 60 pounds while eating exclusively at McDonald's for 180 days, he said, "I'm not pushing McDonald's. I'm not pushing fast food. I'm pushing taking accountability and making the right choice for you individually... As a science teacher, I would never show Super Size Me because when I watched that, I never saw the educational value in that... I mean, a guy eats uncontrollable amounts of food, stops exercising, and the whole world is surprised he puts on weight? What I'm not proud about is probably 70 to 80 percent of my colleagues across the United States still show Super Size Me in their health class or their biology class. I don't get it."[27]

As a counterpoint, the film features interviews with Big Mac aficionado Don Gorske, who eats an average of two Big Macs a day, yet maintains his weight and cholesterol.

Impact

Six weeks after the film's debut, McDonald's discontinued its supersize portions.[28] In the United Kingdom, McDonald's publicized a website which included a response to and criticisms of the film.[29] In theaters in the UK, the company placed a brief ad in the film's trailers, pointing to the URL and stating, "See what we disagree with. See what we agree with."

Internationally, Super Size Me was a major success in the box office of Australia.[30] McDonald's in Australia responded with an advertising campaign that included three elements: two advertisements for TV and one produced to be shown in movie theaters.[30]

The film was the inspiration for the BBC television series The Supersizers... in which the presenters dine on historical meals and take medical tests to ascertain the impact on their health.[31]

The film was also inspiration for the 2007 documentary film Super High Me directed by Michael Blieden. The film follows Doug Benson, a comedian and cannabis enthusiast, as he becomes the subject to a multitude of tests designed to measure the physical and mental impacts of, first, not smoking cannabis for 30 days, and then smoking non-stop for 30 days. The poster for the movie was modeled after one of the promotional posters from Super Size Me.

Comments

Popular Posts

제임스 코벳: 지역 정부가 곧 세계정부이다 1 / 프랑스, 캐나다도 EU 가입할 수 있어 / 다극화된 세계질서는 신세계질서의 연막술 / 골드만삭스 출신 짐 오닐이 만든 용어 BRICS / 브릭스 국가들이 기술 관료주의, 과두제, 온라인 검열, 사회 신용 시스템, 코로나19 팬데믹, 생물 안보, 지속 가능한 개발 목표 등 모든 것에 동의하는 이유는 '거대한 클럽'에 속해 있기 때문 / 중국이 주도하는 국제은행간통신협회(SWIFT) 대안인 중국은행간결제시스템(CIPS)은 거래의 80%를 SWIFT 네트워크에 의존 / 존 메이너드 케인스의 '뱅코어(Bankor)' 개념은 생산적인 대출을 통해 인프라 투자를 장려하는 것이었으며, 이는 BRICS 국가들의 대출 철학과 유사 / BRICS 국가들이 국제통화기금(IMF)과 같은 '약탈적인 괴물'로부터 세계를 구원할 것이라는 주장과 달리, 아시아인프라투자은행(AIIB)과 신개발은행(NDB) 설립 직후 이들과 세계은행, IMF 간의 제도적 연결고리가 드러났다. IMF 총재 크리스틴 라가르드는 AIIB와의 협력을 약속했다. 세계은행 총재 김용은 AIIB 출범을 축하하며 협력을 약속했다. 신개발은행 총재는 경쟁 관계가 아닌 상호 보완적인 관계임을 밝히며 협력 협정을 체결했다. BRICS 신개발은행 부총재는 IMF 집행 이사로 활동하며 협력과 공동 행동을 약속했다. AIIB와 NDB 설립을 앞두고 '게임의 판도를 완전히 바꿀 것'이라는 기대가 있었지만, 실제로는 기존 시스템과의 협력을 통해 '시스템의 일부'가 되는 것을 목표로 했다. / 유엔은 러시아와 중국이 시행한 격리 및 전염병 통제 조치를 칭찬하며, 유엔이 테러 및 평화 유지에 중심적인 역할을 해야 한다고 주장한다. / 세계 정부 1.0은 국제 연맹, 2.0은 유엔으로 볼 수 있으며, 3.0은 다극화된 세계 질서이다. / 러시아와 중국은 세계주의자들에 맞서 싸우는 것이 아니라, 단지 세계 정부 테이블에 앉을 자리를 놓고 경쟁하는 것이다.